
VAT and tax funding for law firms and partners
Law firm VAT and tax funding spreads a VAT quarter, partners’ self-assessment or corporation tax over the following months, so…
How law firms fund WIP, lock-up and case disbursements: revolving credit, term loans, invoice discounting and disbursement lines, and what lenders check.
Explore funding options Prefer a quick call back? Leave your number
“I highly recommend this company: excellent service all round.”
In short
What you need to know.
Revolving credit suits cyclical lock-up, term loans suit a one-off increase, and specialist disbursement lines suit contingent-fee litigation. Lenders focus on lock-up days, WIP write-offs and the firm's work mix.
A transaction we arranged
£30,000
£30K working capital for a solicitors’ practice.
Structured for the cash-flow profile of a legal practice rather than an asset-backed business.
Read the transactionAbout WIP and disbursement funding
Specialist knowledge. Better outcomes.
This page is for managing partners, COLPs, COFAs and finance directors whose fee earners are busy but whose office account is thin, because time is sitting in WIP, bills are sitting unpaid and disbursements have been paid out on matters that will not settle for months. We are a broker, not a lender: we arrange working capital facilities for law firms from £10,000 to £20 million, by approaching the lenders on our panel that understand how legal fees are earned. It sits within our wider solicitor practice loans section.
The shape of a firm's funding need depends heavily on its work mix, and lenders read it that way.
Lock-up is the number of days between a fee earner recording time and the firm banking the fee. It has two parts: WIP days (time recorded but not yet billed) and debtor days (bills issued but not yet paid). Add unrecovered disbursements and you have the full amount of the firm's own money working for its clients.
Lenders and firms both use lock-up because it is the single figure that explains why a profitable practice can struggle to pay salaries at the end of the month. Profit in the accounts is earned when time is recorded and valued; the cash only arrives when the client pays. A firm growing its fee income usually sees lock-up grow in pounds even if the days stay flat, because every new fee earner adds months of unbilled time before their first bill is paid.
A hypothetical example in round figures shows the scale. A firm billing £2,000,000 a year earns roughly £5,500 of fees per calendar day. If its lock-up runs at 150 days, about £820,000 of fees is tied up at any moment. Bringing lock-up down by 30 days would release around £160,000 of cash permanently, which is often more than the firm was about to borrow. Funding and collection work are not alternatives: the best outcome is usually a modest facility alongside a plan to shorten lock-up.
Borrowing against WIP treats the symptom. If lock-up is long because bills go out late, the cheapest capital is a monthly billing discipline, interim bills on long matters and money on account for disbursements at the start of each file. Many firms find that tightening engagement letters and chasing aged debt releases more than any facility.
A facility sized to today's lock-up can also become permanent. If WIP never falls, the firm is paying interest indefinitely on a funding gap it could have closed with more partner capital. Personal guarantees are usual for facilities to partnerships and LLPs, so partners should read them carefully, and it is worth reading up on how personal guarantees work before signing one. Contingent-fee firms face a particular risk: a run of lost cases can leave disbursement funding to repay with no recovery behind it, unless it is protected by after-the-event cover.
Rising lock-up alongside flat fees suggests a billing or collection problem that more borrowing will not cure.
Lenders want to know what proportion of recorded time is actually billed and collected. A history of heavy write-downs reduces the value they place on WIP.
A firm dependent on one referral source, one insurer client or one type of claim carries more risk than a balanced practice.
Under the SRA Accounts Rules, client money must be kept separate and cannot fund the firm. Lenders look solely at office account statements, and disbursements not covered by money on account are paid from office funds.
Partner drawings compared with profit, and whether capital accounts have been built up or run down.
Qualifying PII in place, no outstanding SRA investigation, and a clean record on accounts rule breaches.
How the main business finance structures work. Lenders set their own terms, so treat this as a guide to the questions to ask.
| Option | How you repay | Security | Often used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unsecured business loan | Fixed instalments, usually monthly | No charge over assets; a personal guarantee is usually required | Growth, stock, tax bills and cash flow |
| Secured business loan | Fixed instalments, often over a longer term | A charge over property or other assets | Larger sums, property and refinancing |
| Revolving credit facility | Interest on what you draw; repay and redraw | Varies by lender and case | Recurring or uneven cash flow gaps |
| Merchant cash advance | A share of future card takings | No charge over assets | Card-taking businesses with uneven months |
| Asset finance | Regular payments over the life of the asset | The asset being financed | Equipment, vehicles and machinery |
| Invoice finance | Settled as customers pay their invoices | Your unpaid invoices | Businesses waiting on customer payment |
General information only. Every lender has its own criteria, and all finance is subject to status.
| Option | Best suited to | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving credit facility | Firms whose need rises and falls with billing cycles | Facility fees apply even when undrawn; limits are reviewed |
| Working capital term loan | A one-off step up in lock-up, such as after hiring a team | Fixed repayments continue even if a big matter settles early |
| Invoice discounting | Firms billing businesses on regular bills | Only funds issued bills, not unbilled time or contingent fees |
| Disbursement funding line | PI, clinical negligence and volume litigation | Funder scrutinises case selection and outcomes |
| Partner capital | Firms whose capital base has fallen behind growth | Moves the burden onto individual partners |
A revolving credit facility is the natural fit for WIP because the need is cyclical. You draw when a heavy month of counsel's fees lands and repay when a large matter settles. Interest runs only on the drawn balance, although lenders usually charge an arrangement or non-utilisation fee.
Where lock-up has stepped up for a specific reason, for example a new litigation team that will take a year to produce paid bills, a fixed working capital loan can match that one-off investment. It gives certainty but is less forgiving if cash comes in faster than expected, so check early repayment terms.
Firms with a commercial client base can release cash from unpaid bills through invoice finance, usually confidential invoice discounting so clients continue to pay the firm. It does not reach unbilled WIP, and lenders are wary of bills to individuals or bills contingent on outcome. Where bills have gone unpaid for a long time, aged debt funding is a separate route, and a lender will weigh each old bill by who owes it and for how long.
Specialist disbursement funders provide a facility the firm draws matter by matter to pay experts, medical records and court fees, repaid when the case concludes. Some structures are linked to after-the-event insurance, so the disbursement is covered if the case is lost. The funder is effectively assessing the firm's case selection, so expect questions about success rates by claim type.
It is free to enquire; any broker fee is disclosed separately before you proceed. If your cash pressure comes from a specific bill rather than lock-up, see our pages on funding a VAT quarter or tax bill and funding your PII renewal.
Rarely as a direct asset. Unbilled time is not a debt anyone owes the firm yet, so most lenders treat it as evidence of future fee income rather than as security. The facility is usually secured by a debenture and partners' guarantees, with WIP informing how much the firm can afford.
No. Disbursement funding lends to the firm to pay the costs of running cases and is repaid by the firm. Third-party litigation funding usually finances a specific claim in return for a share of the damages or costs, and the funder takes the risk of losing.
It varies widely by work type. Conveyancing firms can run very short lock-up because fees come from completion monies, while contingent-fee litigation firms can carry much longer cycles. The useful comparison is your own trend and your peers in the same practice area. Tracking it monthly, as part of working out your working capital, shows whether it is drifting.
Yes, although the lender relies more on the practitioner's own credit and income record. Borrowing of £25,000 or less by sole traders and small partnerships can be regulated consumer credit, which brings additional protections.
Yes, high lock-up is often the reason firms look for WIP and disbursement funding, but lenders will want to understand why it is high and whether it is improving. They look at the age of WIP, write-off history, the type of work and billing discipline. A firm that can show a plan to bill faster is usually viewed better than one simply asking for headroom. A revolving credit facility often suits cyclical lock-up.

Law firm VAT and tax funding spreads a VAT quarter, partners’ self-assessment or corporation tax over the following months, so…

Law firm acquisitions are usually funded with a term loan repaid from the enlarged firm’s profits, alongside the buyer’s own…
Solicitors’ PII funding spreads the professional indemnity premium, which every SRA-authorised firm must pay to keep…

Professional firms can often borrow on the strength of recurring fee income and qualified principals rather than hard assets.…

Invoice finance works for accountancy firms whose fees are billed to limited companies and other businesses: a provider…

Law firms usually buy their office with a commercial mortgage, but the key decision is who owns the building: the firm itself,…
What our clients say
“I’d like to say a big thank you to Simon and the team for successfully assisting with the sourcing and placing of our most recent funding. Simon was able to secure a lend when others appeared to have run out of appetite to place business or source viable options. I would highly recommend Simon should you need to raise capital or finance for your business needs.”
“Simon was fast, kept us updated at all stages and was a real pleasure to work with on our asset finance. I highly recommend this company: excellent service all round.”
“Spoke with Simon, who managed to get me the loan I needed promptly. The whole process was very smooth and was completed within a few days.”
“Getting a business loan can feel like a bit of a minefield, but everything was broken down for me in great detail. Will use again in the future!”
“Simon was a pleasure to deal with and helped us find a business loan that matched our growth goals and future expansion plans.”
“I couldn’t source funding for my business, but the team got in touch within an hour and had it sorted within 24 hours. Fantastic service, and I would definitely use them again.”